Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
FIL 
XRP Summary
Matt Hamilton opposes expanding XRPL's Memo limit by 1200 times and warns that larger files could significantly increase storage requirements across the network infrastructure.
The proposal supports the direct embedding of images, documents, videos, source code and compressed packages in XRPL transactions, expanding potential use beyond the payment realm.
Hamilton prefers dedicated storage networks such as Filecoin, which he believes can handle large files without increasing the cost of independent XRPL node operators.
Text
Former Ripple executive Matt Hamilton recently criticized a proposal to significantly expand the Memo field of XRP ledger transactions to store larger files. The proposal plans to increase the current Memo limit of 1KB to approximately 1.3 MB, or expand it approximately 1200 times. Proponents believe this change could allow developers and users to interact with XRPL beyond traditional financial transactions.
According to XRPL Foundation contributor Vet, the expanded Memo field will allow users to directly embed multiple types of files in transactions, including images, PDF documents, music clips, Short Video, source code, and compressed packages. Proponents argue that network participants should have greater freedom to decide how to use available ledger space. Under this thinking, users who are willing to pay corresponding transaction costs will be able to store more information.
In addition, the proposal would help support applications that combine financial transactions with documents or other digital content. However, Hamilton believes that these benefits could come with huge infrastructure costs. He served as director of developer relations at Ripple and bluntly said that the expansion plan was "a very bad idea." His criticism mainly centers on how XRPL nodes maintain and process ledger information.
Hamilton expressed concern about XRPL storage growth
XRPL is essentially a distributed payment ledger rather than a decentralized file storage network. Therefore, introducing significantly larger transactions may increase storage requirements across the network infrastructure. Verifiers and other nodes must maintain ledger information to effectively participate in network operations. Allowing users to upload larger files, the size of the database will accelerate as transaction volume increases.
Hamilton believes that higher storage requirements will ultimately increase the hardware costs of independent node operations. In addition, smaller operators may face greater difficulties in maintaining the infrastructure needed to participate in the network. This possibility raises concerns about decentralization, as higher operating costs may hinder some independent participants. Hamilton prefers to separate XRPL's payment functions from applications that require large amounts of data storage.
He sees dedicated decentralized storage systems such as Filecoin as a more suitable choice for handling large files. Such platforms are specifically designed to handle distributed data storage without imposing this responsibility on a payment-focused blockchain. Developers can store files over a private network and record relevant reference or transaction information on XRPL. This allows applications to access external content without having to permanently store every large file on the XRPL node.
The debate reflects different views on how far XRPL functions should go beyond payments and asset transfers. Proponents argue that larger Memo capacity provides more flexibility, while critics emphasize network efficiency and operational requirements.
Conclusion
The proposed plan to expand Memo by 1200 times may significantly increase the amount of information a user can contain in a single XRPL transaction. However, Hamilton believes that a dedicated storage network provides a more efficient approach without adding to the long-term infrastructure burden on XRPL. The core of this debate ultimately lies in balancing functional expansion with network efficiency and decentralization.
