Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
BTC Bitcoin's BIP-110 soft fork stalled due to insufficient miners 'support after activating two blocks.
Bitcoin's latest soft fork attempt (BIP-110) only advanced two blocks after being activated last weekend and then stalled, causing the fork chain to lag behind the main network by dozens of blocks. This development highlights the challenges faced in implementing protocol changes without broad miners 'consensus.
What happened to BIP-110?
Chain splitting occurred at block height of 961,632, when a small number of miners began producing blocks according to the new rules. However, about eight hours later, only two blocks were dug up on the bifurcated chain, and the network failed to gain momentum for development. Data shows that miners 'support for the bifurcated chain is only 2.53%, well below the 55% activation threshold required for the proposal to take effect.
BIP-110 is a temporary soft fork proposal designed to limit the amount of non-payment data that can be embedded in Bitcoin transactions. The explicit goal is to reduce the use of inscriptions and runes, which are increasingly popular methods of storing arbitrary data on the blockchain, thereby reducing the burden on the entire node that needs to process and verify these transactions.
Community resistance and governance tensions
The proposal encountered strong opposition within the Bitcoin community. Many see this as an attempt at censorship, arguing that it will restrict users 'use of blockchain beyond simple value transfers. This sentiment is reflected in low support among miners, as most mining pools refuse to show readiness for a fork.
The stagnation highlights the decentralized nature of Bitcoin governance: protocol changes require not only technical implementation, but also broad consensus among miners, node operators and users. Without such consensus, any fork risks becoming an isolated chain, as we have seen this time.
Why this matters
For Bitcoin users and investors, this incident reminds us that the ongoing debate over the use and scalability of the network continues. While inscriptions and runes bring new use cases and fee revenue, they also increase the data load on nodes, raising concerns about centralized pressures. The failure of BIP-110 shows that, at least for now, the community values open access more than efficiency improvements.
From a market perspective, this failed fork has little impact on the price of Bitcoin, and the price remains stable. This suggests traders view such governance frictions as regular events, but could affect market sentiment if they escalate into more controversial hard forks.
Conclusion
The rapid stagnation of the BIP-110 soft fork demonstrates Bitcoin's resilient governance model-it requires consensus rather than allowing a few people to force change. Although the proposal could be reintroduced in a different form, its current failure reflects the community's caution in changing the basic attributes of the network. As the ecosystem evolves, the debate over data limitations and transaction flexibility is likely to continue and shape Bitcoin's trajectory in the coming years.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is BIP-110?
BIP-110 is a proposed Bitcoin soft fork that aims to limit the amount of non-payment data embedded in transactions, targeting inscriptions and runes to reduce node load.
Q2: Why is the fork stalled?
The fork stalled because only 2.53% of miners supported it, well below the activation threshold of 55%. Without enough computing power, the chain cannot advance.
Q3: What is the impact on Bitcoin users?
Currently, users do not need to make any changes. A failed fork means that inscriptions and runes continue to function as before. The incident highlighted the community's resistance to so-called censorship and its preference for open, permission-free innovative methods.
