EN ▼
Favorites
My Favorites
View All
Market Cap Price 24h%

Disclaimer: Content does not constitute investment advice. Trading involves risks—please invest with caution!

加密货币诈骗警报:Magic Eden疑似因白帽漏洞损失3,832枚NFT

2026-09-26 04:24:46
Bookmark

Key Insights

In crypto fraud news, Magic Eden faces a suspicious security issue involving the transfer of 3,832 NFTs from hundreds of wallets. According to reports, a "white-hat" hacker securely saved the affected NFT to an address that started with 0x71cF. Magic Eden has not disclosed the cause or the full picture of the incident, and it is expected that the affected NFT will be returned to its original owner.

Magic Eden Suspected of Crypto Fraud: Suspicious Security Issue Outbreaks

Magic Eden is at the center of a suspicious security issue involving thousands of non-homogeneous tokens (NFTs). According to reports, a "white hat" person transferred 3,832 NFTs from hundreds of wallets. Because the assets come from multiple user wallets, the move has raised concerns across the NFT market.

However, available information from the NFT market does not confirm that these assets were stolen for personal gain. Instead, the persons involved were described as "white hats". The term generally refers to those who discover or respond to security issues and have no intention of retaining affected assets.

According to Wu Blockchain, these NFTs were transferred after suspected vulnerabilities were discovered. The report did not disclose specific weaknesses that allowed asset movements. As a result, the matter remains an active security matter for Magic Eden and affected NFT holders. The full picture of the problem remains unclear until more information is released.

Magic Eden is suspected of encryption fraud| Source: Wu Blockchain

Yuga Labs 首席执行官 Michael Figge 表示,该问题是在数小时前发现的。他还称,Yuga Labs 区块链副总裁 Quit 正在处理“白帽”救援行动中的资产。这一参与增加了回应的复杂性。受影响的 NFT 并未暴露在外,而是据报道被转移到一个受控位置以保护其安全。

白帽救援期间转移了 3,832 个 NFT

使用网名 0xQuit 的 Quit 表示,这些 NFT 目前安全保存在一个以 0x71cF 开头的地址中。在解决安全风险期间,这些资产预计将留在那里。

根据网上分享的信息,一旦风险解除,NFT 将归还给其原始所有者。这意味着当前的转移不应自动被视为永久损失。

尽管如此,此次加密诈骗仍令受影响用户的 NFT 感到担忧。涉及有价值数字资产的钱包活动可能会迅速引发对盗窃的恐惧,尤其是当涉及许多账户时。据报道,这 3,832 个 NFT 来自数百个钱包。这一细节表明这是一起更广泛的事件,而非单个孤立钱包的问题。

目前,尚无关于受影响系列或个别所有者的确认分类。也没有对这 3,832 个 NFT 的确认价值。这使得衡量疑似加密诈骗的经济影响变得困难。NFT 的数量提供了规模的清晰画面,但并非其总市场价值。

Therefore, the "white hat" response focuses first and foremost on ensuring the safety of assets. After the underlying risks have been resolved, they will be returned to the original owners.

Magic Eden has not disclosed the reason for the encryption fraud

Magic Eden has not disclosed the reason for the suspected vulnerability. The market also did not provide a complete public explanation of the incident. This leaves important questions unanswered about how wallets are affected. This also means that users do not yet fully understand what triggered the transfer.

The lack of confirmation makes it difficult to determine whether other wallets face the same risks. Further information from Magic Eden can clarify the scope and explain what users should note.

Meanwhile, the safe NFT remains in the process of a reported "white hat" rescue. Quit said assets will be returned after the risk is removed. The incident also highlights the broader security risks faced by NFT users. Once a security vulnerability affects a connected wallet or marketplace system, digital assets may move quickly.

For Magic Eden users, the current focus remains on the affected NFTs and the return process. Until Magic Eden releases more details, the full impact of the suspected crypto fraud remains unknown.

Another report involving KelpDAO also shows the broader security pressures faced by encryption projects. According to reports, KelpDAO has sued LayerZero and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino for the use of the rsETH bridge. KelpDAO accused LayerZero of failing to disclose security risks and preventing attackers from damaging its infrastructure. The case was handled separately from the Magic Eden incident.

Disclaimer:

All content published on this website, including hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blogs, and other media accounts, originates from third-party platforms and their users. CoinMarketInsight makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the website or its content. All blockchain-related data and materials are provided for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Users and third parties are solely responsible for the content they publish. CoinMarketInsight shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this website. You should exercise caution and conduct your own independent research, review, analysis, and verification before making any decisions.

Read Full Article
More News
TOP

TOP