Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
FollowingOstium联合创始人披露两年协议营收：约4470万美元收入与296万美元毛利
Ostium的一名联合创始人表示，一份为期两年的协议产生了约4470万美元的总收入和约296万美元的毛利润。尽管Ostium此前因影响其流动性池的重大安全事件而面临审查，但这些数据仍反映了该协议的商业活动情况。
来自联合创始人的收入声明
约4470万美元的收入数字直接归因于Ostium的一位联合创始人，涵盖了这份为期两年的商业协议的全部周期。该声明明确使用了“大约”这一限定词，意味着该数字并未作为经过审计或独立验证的总额提出。此外，声明中未提及交易对手方、合同起始日期或底层服务类型。
需要指出的是，将数据归因于联合创始人而非官方文件或经审计的披露，对于评估这些数字的读者而言是一个重要的区别。截至报道时，尚未公开链接任何支持性文件、方法论或第三方验证来佐证这些收入主张。
约296万美元的毛利反映直接成本扣除
In addition to top-level revenue figures, the co-founder also cited gross profits of approximately $2.96 million generated from the same two-year agreement. Gross profit is the balance of revenue after deducting costs directly related to the delivery of that revenue (such as operating expenses, agreement fees paid to liquidity providers, or infrastructure costs directly attributable to the agreement). It is not net income; taxes, administrative expenses and other operating expenses are not deducted at the gross profit level.
The gap between revenue of $44.7 million and gross profit of $2.96 million indicates that direct costs were approximately $41.7 million during the two years. This figure highlights the high capital intensity that the underlying agreement can be. However, the co-founder's statement did not disclose details of the cost structure or revenue-generating activities.
Key details not answered in the statement
The statement raises several questions that are critical to a comprehensive assessment of these numbers:
- The counterparties to the two agreements have not yet been named, and specific start and end dates have not been clarified.
- It is unclear whether this revenue is generated through transaction fees, market-making activities, liquidity provision or other service lines unique to Ostium's perpetual contract infrastructure.
- Whether the figures of $44.7 million and $2.96 million were derived from internal estimates, management accounts, or formal audits remains unconfirmed.
Before providing corroborating documentation, readers should view these two numbers as approximations and attribute them only to a single internal source.
Concurrent context: Ostium's safety record
These financial data are released in the context of recorded losses at the level of the agreement. Ostium suffered a oracle manipulation attack that resulted in 18 million USDC being drained, removing about one-third of the protocol's liquidity in one incident. A subsequent off-chain breach resulted in the theft of 23.75 million USDC, which heightened questions about the security of the protocol's on-chain and off-chain system operations.
Although these security incidents are different from the commercial agreements referred to by the co-founders, they are relevant context for assessing Ostium's financial health. Agreement-level losses resulting from exploits are not necessarily included in the gross profit calculations linked to specific commercial contracts, but they can have a significant impact on the overall net financial position.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is reported revenue?
Approximately $44.7 million, announced by Ostium co-founders. This figure is an approximation and has not been independently verified.
What is the reported gross profit?
The same two-year agreement generated approximately US$2.96 million, representing revenue less direct costs. This is not a net profit figure.
How long did the agreement last?
Two years, according to the co-founder's statement. No specific start and end dates were announced when the statement was issued.
Who made this statement?
A co-founder of Ostium. In public reports, the specific names of individuals who quoted the numbers in the title have not been identified.
What details are not provided?
The identity of the counterparty, the subject matter of the agreement, the cost breakdown behind the gross profit figure, and any audit or verification status are missing from the available disclosures.
