Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
XRP Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple Technology, admitted frustration in promoting the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act
Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple Technology, posted on the X platform, admitting that his team had failed to make expected progress in promoting the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. This is a rare public admission by one of the most influential policy advocates in the cryptocurrency space of a setback in the legislative process.
Galinghouse issued the statement directly on the X platform, admitting that his team had missed its goal in advancing the bill. Given that Garinhaus has been an industry leader in promoting the legislation, this statement has attracted widespread attention. He had previously expressed confidence that the Clarity Act was expected to pass quickly, so this admission of failure marked a significant change in tone.
Significance of the Clarity Act for cryptocurrency regulation
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act was introduced as Bill 3633 of the 119th House of Representatives to establish a regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States. The bill attempts to clearly distinguish which tokens fall under the category of securities and which fall under commodity regulation.
This bill is crucial for Ripple, led by Garlinhaus. A lack of regulatory clarity has plagued the company's legal battle for years. Garinhaus has pointed out that during the 2020 Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action, regulators almost forced Ripple to cease operations completely.
However, the bill faces resistance from various sides. Differences among U.S. cryptocurrency industry leaders over specific stablecoin provisions in the Senate draft have complicated forming the coalition needed to push legislation. Even though there is broad industry support for the bill's core goals, these internal industry disputes have increased resistance to the legislative process.
Frustration rather than surrender
Galinghaus's statement shows that industry lobbying efforts have not been translated into legislative momentum this cycle. The gap between advocacy and results is significant: Ripple and its allies have invested a lot of resources in Washington, and the setback suggests that the road to legislation is much more difficult than public optimism suggests.
The Clarity Act had exceeded many expectations, successfully passed committee review and awaited a full Senate vote. Being blocked at this stage has a more profound impact than early procedural failure.
Galinghaus's public admission does not answer whether the reason for the gap is not yet ripe, weak alliance building, or political headwinds that exceed industry control. As of press time, there were no further details on the next step of planning or revised strategies.
The question now is whether this statement will prompt the industry to recalibrate its strategy for the next legislative window in a more proactive manner, or whether Ripple's broader policy ambitions will quietly absorb the defeat and reshape it for the next session. Garlinhouse's past record shows that he will not remain silent for long.
