EN ▼
Favorites
My Favorites
View All
Market Cap Price 24h%

Disclaimer: Content does not constitute investment advice. Trading involves risks—please invest with caution!

Kraken\'s European banking landscape: Why exchanges pursue deposit channels rather than just trans

2026-07-10 00:02:28
Bookmark

Picture a euro trader trying to transfer money on Friday: He hopes to catch the weekend\'s price correction. Cryptocurrency exchanges are liquid and markets are volatile, but deposits are stuck as payment partners enter maintenance or become hesitant.

It is this bottleneck-the banking track-that has prompted Kraken to now seek a full European banking license and list Lithuania as its preferred place to settle. This is not about another transaction cost, but about controlling the channels through which money actually flows.

The timing is not accidental. The MiCA regulations will come into effect for exchanges in Europe on July 1, 2026, and the scoreboard already shows who leads under the new mechanism. DefiLlama\'s MiCA dashboard ranks Kraken as a liquidity leader among regulated EU trading venues, with spot liquidity of approximately US$399.7 million and perpetual contract liquidity of approximately US$206.9 million, covering approximately 1704 markets.

Big picture: The intersection of EU banking and crypto tracks

Traders complain about slippage, but compliance chiefs are more blunt: Partner risk is killing them. After MiCA took effect in July, over-the-counter trading desks redirected funds flows to venues with clearer licensing and more stable funds. One sign of quietness is job recruitment in the payments operations and funds departments of large exchanges. Organizations that are building IBANs and planning channels are setting benchmarks for everyone else\'s user experience.

Three things happened at the same time. MiCA\'s enforcement of exchanges takes effect. Instant payments in euros are being promoted across the EU. Exchanges are tired of third-party interruptions and sudden de-risk and are trying to have their own fiat channel end-to-end.

Kraken has shown how seriously he takes this matter. The company said it had obtained MiCA authorization through the Central Bank of Ireland and pointed to July 1 as the effective date for European enforcement. Reports later emerged that the company was seeking a European banking license and made Lithuania the preferred jurisdiction.

The core of the story is not \"more currencies\" or \"lower fees.\" In Europe, the real moat is who controls the IBAN that can recharge your cryptocurrency balance in seconds rather than days?

Users experience fewer deposit failures. Exchanges feel less supplier risk. Regulators are given a single regulated entity that can be held accountable. Everyone is closer to a mature market structure.

How we got here: From SEPA bottleneck to MiCA switch

Over the years, exchanges have pieced together a network of e-money institutions, payment institutions and traditional agent banks. It worked until it failed. A series of de-risk cycles that followed the 2022 and 2023 crashes turned regular euro transfers into a guessing game.

SEPA as a silent moat

SEPA is supposed to be a bland pipeline, and that\'s why it\'s important. When your deposits depend on a partner\'s IBAN, you inherit the partner\'s risk policies, uptime, and queues. Even a slight reconciliation error can freeze the flow of retail deposits during the busiest time of the week.

Compliance changes the landscape

MiCA not only adds rules, but also unifies manuals across the EU. Exchanges that choose to join the mechanism can operate with clearer expectations. Kraken said he had obtained MiCA authorization through Ireland and noted that July 1, 2026 was the date when enforcement would take effect on European exchanges. This clarity creates space for investing in deeper infrastructure, such as becoming a bank rather than renting a bank.

Licensing Overview

Payment institutions: Provide payment services and cannot absorb deposits. Capital/regulation is relatively low. Typical trade-off: Relying on cooperative banks to provide account and fund protection.

Electronic money institutions: Can issue electronic money and wallets to protect customer funds. Medium capital/supervision. Trade-off: The interest rate of electronic money is limited and banks still need to provide tracks.

Credit institutions (banks): can absorb deposits, issue loans, and have wider access to payment systems. Higher capital/supervision. Trade-offs: stricter prudential rules, governance and ongoing auditing.

This is why, once an exchange is big enough, it continues to revolve around \"becoming a bank.\" You can rent the tracks or you can own them and take on all the responsibilities that come with it.

What can a bank license unlock for an exchange?

To be clear, a bank license is not a magical money printing machine. It is a license to engage in difficult, regulated matters. But its ability to unlock accurately matches the needs of modern exchanges.

Beyond the income of market makers and buyers

Transaction fees are only part of this. With the banking track, exchanges can compete in on-the-spot deposits and withdrawals, cryptocurrency purchase card receipts, and the provision of basic banking products around fiat balances when permitted. This can diversify revenue sources and get rid of a pure market volume cycle. When you don\'t have to pay third parties to transfer customer funds, payment costs are also reduced.

Operational stability and speed

Having an IBAN allows you to shorten your funding cycle by minutes or hours, especially if you support SEPA instant payments. It also reduces reliance on a chain of partners, each of which can become a single point of failure in volatile markets.

Better alignment with MiCA era regulation

Regulators want direct lines of accountability. A licensed bank that also operates a MiCA-authorized exchange is a single, regulated border. This doesn\'t mean that review will become easier, but that expectations will be clearer.

How construction usually works

Select a jurisdiction with the right regulatory authority, talent pool and passport path.

Apply for authorization and agree on a business model in writing. Multiple requests for information are expected.

Establish truly isolated risk, compliance, anti-money laundering, funds and payment operations departments.

Through direct or indirect participation, connect to a payment system such as SEPA, ideally instant payment.

Pilot the customer process in the controlled phase. Provide daily evidence of fund protection and account reconciliation.

Promote to a broader base, monitor, iterate, and prepare for on-site inspections.

This will take months or years, not weeks. But once online, the customer experience will become simple. This is the key.

Kraken\'s status

Kraken\'s strategy outline has been made public, although the exact timetable is unknown. The company said it had obtained MiCA authorization through the Central Bank of Ireland and noted that July 1 was the exchange\'s enforcement date. Subsequent reports revealed that Kraken (via Payward) was seeking a European banking license and made Lithuania the preferred jurisdiction.

In terms of market structure, DefiLlama\'s new MiCA dashboard ranks Kraken as the top regulated liquidity in the EU, with estimated spot liquidity at US$399.7 million and perpetual contract liquidity at approximately US$206.9 million, supporting approximately 1704 markets. If you can speed up the withdrawal and withdrawal of incoming and outgoing funds, this is a huge shelf.

Kraken in the EU, 2026 overview

MiCA status: According to the company blog, authorized by the Central Bank of Ireland.

License pursuit: The goal is reportedly to obtain a full EU banking license in Lithuania.

Liquidity position: According to DefiLlama, spot and perpetual contracts lead the way in liquidity among MiCA trading venues.

Market coverage: According to DefiLlama, approximately 1704 markets are supported.

This boils down to a simple picture. If you already have order book and compliance capabilities, the bottleneck is payment. By solving bottlenecks, you can change how often users actually use the product.

Rip-on effects on users, tokens and competitors

For retail and professional traders: Faster euro deposits reduce slippage caused by missed admissions. Withdraws that arrive on the same day build trust. If fees fall because the exchange no longer pays processor profits for each transfer payment, the spread can be narrowed and the total transaction cost for active users is reduced.

For institutions: Isolated customer funds accounts, predictable deadlines and clearly documented fund protection are basic requirements. Exchanges with banking licenses can meet these requirements internally, which is important for funds that report to their regulators. This may also make it easier to expand the OTC settlement window without having to be subject to third-party caps.

For stablecoins and their issuers: MiCA sets clear boundaries for e-currency tokens. The issuer must be a credit institution or electronic money institution with limited interest functions. Having a banking license does not automatically mean that new stablecoins appear, but it can simplify the loading and unloading of regulated euro tokens, which helps stabilize marginal prices.

For competitors: This is a slow-moving integration story. The largest trading venues will try to have tracks. Mid-end exchanges may double down on strong payment partners or pursue e-money institutions rather than banks. The smallest players are likely to face more severe economic conditions every time their partners tighten risk.

Things to Pay Attention to in 2026

This strategy takes time, and there are policy downwinds and headwinds that need attention to.

Passport mechanism: EU banking licenses can be used, but product-by-product approval is still important. It is expected to be rolled out gradually by country.

Instant payment coverage: SEPA Instant payment is expanding, but not all channels are performing the same. The difference between \"available\" and \"reliable under peak loads\" is huge.

PSD3 and PSR implementation: The next wave of EU payment rules will continue to change the way authentication, fraud control and account access work. This will affect user processes.

Institutional demand rhythm: If funds are stable, more buyer trading desks will route euro flows directly on exchanges rather than through brokers. This will change where the spread narrows.

How many exchanges will follow: If two or three large trading venues are licensed, payment partners may realign their interest in all other trading venues.

The result is not black and white. Even a credible application can drive negotiations with existing bank partners today. However, the end is obvious. Exchanges that control deposits control the experience.

Risks and possible mistakes

License delays: The bank application cycle is long and involves repeated feedback. The timetable may be delayed and the market will not wait.

Capital and governance burdens: Banking rules require continued capital and independent supervision. Jerry-building is not feasible.

Anti-money laundering and sanctions risks: Banks are closer to the flow of funds. False positives and complex investigations can slow down the pace you seek.

Fraud on real-time tracks: Faster payments compress the window of time to block bad transfers. Controls must be strong without making the account opening process painful.

Correspondent bank risk: Even banks rely on other banks on certain channels. Debanking can still occur, just at a higher level.

Regulatory boundary changes: If rules on pledge, derivative or token listings change, the bank-and-exchange model must adapt quickly.

Having an orbit transfers risks, not eliminating them. The reward is control, and the price is responsibility.

FAQs

Is Kraken already a European bank? No. Reports indicate that Kraken is seeking a full European banking license and has focused on Lithuania as the preferred jurisdiction. Application is a process, not a result.

What changes have occurred to EU exchanges on July 1, 2026? MiCA rules for exchanges take effect. Kraken has stated that it received MiCA authorization through the Central Bank of Ireland and emphasized that July 1 is the exchange\'s enforcement date.

Why is the deposit trajectory more important than just low transaction fees? Fees are important, but if your euro deposit is several hours late or fails, you will miss the transaction. Controlling IBAN and instant payments reduces funding failures, increases speed, and stabilizes the user experience.

What is the difference between an electronic money institution and a bank for an exchange? E-money institutions can issue e-money and run wallets, but still rely on banks to provide core tracks and fund protection. Banks can absorb deposits and have broader and more direct access to payment systems while also being more strictly regulated.

Does a banking license mean Kraken will issue euro stablecoins? Not necessarily. MiCA sets specific rules for e-currency tokens, including who can issue them and how they operate them. A banking license may make it easier to get on and off regulated euro tokens, but issuance is an independent decision.

If the exchange becomes a bank, will users see lower fees? It\'s possible. If payment partners take fewer commissions and real-time tracks reduce operating costs, some of the savings may be passed on. But pricing depends on competition and risk costs, not just licenses.

Why Lithuania? Different EU countries focus on different financial licenses. Lithuania has established a reputation in payment and fintech regulation. The choice often depends on the experience of the regulator, talent pool and passport path.

Disclaimer:

All content published on this website, including hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blogs, and other media accounts, originates from third-party platforms and their users. CoinMarketInsight makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the website or its content. All blockchain-related data and materials are provided for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Users and third parties are solely responsible for the content they publish. CoinMarketInsight shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this website. You should exercise caution and conduct your own independent research, review, analysis, and verification before making any decisions.

Read Full Article
More News
TOP

TOP