Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
FollowingAFX-operated bridges suffered USDC vulnerabilities and lost US$24.15 million
The material on which this report is based stated that Blockaid reported a US$24.15 million USDC loss on AFX-operated bridges, but the corresponding public record of this claim is still weak. As of press time, the evidence package mainly points to a cited X platform post and does not contain a more complete incident report, transaction hash or statements from AFX operators.
This quoted platform X post is the core supporting document available for this report. Based on this record alone, the narrowest scope that can be confirmed is that the reported losses involve USDC and the services affected are described as bridges operated by AFX.
Equally important, the cited material does not confirm certain key information. The same X post did not provide a wallet address, contract identifier, bridge suspension notice or block browser link in the materials provided, so readers were unable to independently track any relevant capital flows.
This omission leaves several routine verification points unanswered. The X post did not show a timestamp for the alleged capital outflow, did not specify whether the reported capital outflow was a single transaction or multiple, and did not specify which address received the USDC first.
This lack of key evidence limits the depth of today's reporting. Without public records other than the cited post, this article cannot verify the exploit path, the destination of the funds outflow, or whether any recovery or containment actions have been initiated.
This also means that readers cannot yet determine whether the affected bridges are still running, suspended, or limited to certain transfers. The X materials currently provided for this article do not include user guides, refund instructions, or technical descriptions of how to perform suspected exploits.
Other reports have covered the NIGHT bridge vulnerability, the collapse of Balance Coin after suspected exploits, and the SecondFi wallet vulnerability. However, in the AFX case, the existing evidence still boils down to the same cited X post rather than a more complete operator thread or on-chain disclosure.
The next meaningful confirmation will be an official statement from AFX, a named contract, or a blockchain browser page associated with reporting losses. None of these currently appears in the cited X-Materials, so any stronger statement about user impact, chain risks, or remedial actions would exceed the scope of currently available evidence.
