Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
FollowingAccording to unconfirmed reports, exploits against AFX bridges have resulted in approximately $24.15 million in USDC being withdrawn. The specific details of how the attacker hacked into the cross-chain infrastructure have not been independently verified, and the relevant amount is only preliminary.
The loss involved USDC, a stablecoin pegged to the dollar, whose value was designed to track 1 dollar, so any withdrawn balance could be denominated directly in dollars. Since the reported data comes from a single early source, the specific exploit mechanism, affected chains, and the final total loss should be considered unconfirmed until confirmed by the project party or on-chain data.
Why bridging vulnerabilities can cause huge stablecoin losses
Bridges transfer tokens between blockchains by pooling assets, which concentrates value into a single contract, making it a repeated target for attackers. Once the bridge is emptied, all users whose funds are locked into it may be affected. This pattern has been common in recent events. Allbridge (another cross-chain protocol) suspended services after encountering a $1.65 million Solana vulnerability, and another suspected Hedera vulnerability was related to funds transferred to Ethereum. Since stablecoins have a fixed dollar value, losses denominated in USDC will appear directly in conspicuous dollar figures, which tends to raise concerns about liquidity and user trust more than losses in volatile tokens.
What will users and the market focus on next
A loss of this magnitude often turns attention to how to respond to the affected project: whether to suspend bridges, publish incident reports, and communicate directly with users. There is currently evidence that the AFX official statement has not been confirmed. Users want to know whether withdrawals are affected, how big the remaining exposure is, and whether there are any compensation plans. Some projects have moved quickly in this regard, such as Gnosis Pay's refunds to users after being hit by a $1.8 million vulnerability. Other projects have taken different paths. In one recent case, an Ethereum DeFi vulnerability left affected participants with little to do, highlighting the difference in outcomes. As investigators and project parties release verified information, more details, including confirmed losses and attack vectors, may change.
Disclaimer: This article is for information only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. There are significant risks in the cryptocurrency and digital asset markets. Before making a decision, be sure to study it yourself.
