Co-founder of Dogcoin: Stopping merger mining is "meaningless", community controversy continues

Dogcoin co-founder: Canceling merge mining is "meaningless"

Billy Markus rejected the proposal to remove Dogcoin merge mining, arguing that the feature still has practical significance, despite renewed debate in the community ecology.

Combined mining enhances the security of dogcoin, allowing simultaneous mining of litecoin, and helps miners maximize their profits without spreading computing power.

Marcus emphasized his neutrality, pointing out that he no longer participates in the development of Dogecoin, nor does he hold Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin or other cryptocurrency investments based on the Srypt algorithm.

Dogcoin co-founder

Dogcoin co-founder Billy Marcus criticized the proposal to remove merge mining from the network, calling the idea "stupid and meaningless."

According to Marcus, this mining model can still bring significant benefits, and despite renewed discussions in the community, it should continue to be part of Dogecoin.

Marcus, who is active on the X platform as "Shibetoshi Nakamoto", explained that his views do not involve personal interests. He pointed out that he no longer participated in the development of dogcoin and did not hold any cryptocurrencies based on the Srypt algorithm. Marcus believes that eliminating merge mining will not improve the network. On the contrary, the current system will still work for miners and the blockchain itself.

Dogcoin was merged with Litecoin in August 2014. Since then, miners have used the same computing power to protect both networks simultaneously without having to split the hash rate. As a result, participants can benefit from both cryptocurrencies while contributing to cybersecurity.

Merger mining remains the core of dogcoin security.

Proponents of merger mining believe that the system strengthens dogcoin by attracting more miners and increasing the total hash rate of the network. As a result, blockchain is more resistant to potential attacks, while miners also receive additional incentives.

In addition to dogcoin and litecoin, there are several cryptocurrencies based on the Srypt algorithm that also support merged mining. However, Dogcoin and Litecoin remain the largest and most profitable pairing in the ecosystem.

"As a non-developer and who has not invested in any Srypt altcoins, I just feel that the proposal should solve practical problems and not be fabricated for selfish purposes. I don't think this response is sincere enough. Canceling merge mining makes no sense, so it should not be done."-- Shibetoshi Nakamoto (@BillyM2k) July 20, 2026

Marcus also emphasized that his comments were not influenced by financial interests. He previously revealed that he had sold all his cryptocurrency positions at one time. These assets include 50 bitcoins, 440 litecoins and 6 million dogcoins. If this situation does not change, then he currently has no investment in dogcoins, litecoins or any other Srypt altcoins.

His latest remarks add new perspectives to the ongoing discussions within the Dogcoin community. Although opinions differ, many supporters believe that merged mining allows miners to maximize their profits without sacrificing network performance.

Why Dogecoin adopts merged mining

Dogecoin introduced merged mining during a critical period of its development. Before the feature went online, the hash rate of the blockchain was much lower. Therefore, due to the small number of miners, the network faces a greater 51% attack risk. The integration with Litecoin significantly enhances the security of Dogcoin, allowing the two networks to share mining resources. In addition, this arrangement increases miners 'participation without additional computing power.

Although Marcus has withdrawn from the development of Dogecoin since 2014, his comments continue to receive attention because of his status as the co-founder of the project. According to his latest remarks, canceling merge mining would eliminate a proven security mechanism and would not provide meaningful advantages.

The debate about the dogcoin mining model continues, but Marcus insists that merge mining still plays its due role. His stance strengthens the view that this feature remains an important part of the Dogecoin security and mining ecosystem, rather than an outdated system that needs to be replaced.