Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
FollowingSenate Crypto Bill: Banning Federal Officials from Dealing with Digital Assets
A crypto bill proposed by the U.S. Senate would ban federal officials, including the President, from engaging in cryptocurrency activities. Democratic lawmakers are pushing to tighten conflict of interest rules around digital assets in Washington.
What is prohibited in the Senate Encryption Bill?
Senators Jeff Merkley and Chuck Schumer are leading a measure to limit elected officials 'profits from cryptocurrencies, aiming to end crypto-corruption among Trump and other elected officials. What is striking about the proposal is that it extends coverage to the president, limiting the top positions in the executive branch rather than exempting them.
On the other hand, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand called for a ban on Trump and elected officials from issuing mein coins, indicating that lawmakers are concerned about the involvement of public officials in specific digital assets.
Why are legislators pushing for stricter crypto conflict of interest rules?
These measures revolve around concerns about conflicts of interest: if officials hold or issue digital assets, they may formulate policies that affect the value of those assets. By including top administrative officials, the proposal's sponsors are pushing for higher ethical standards, drawing the line between simply holding crypto assets and having the ability to influence relevant rules. The effort reflects deeper divisions among lawmakers over how public officials should handle exposure to digital assets, which has reportedly become an active fault line within Senate Democrats.
What does this proposal mean for Washington and crypto policy?
The Senate-led bill shows that crypto regulation is still active in Washington, further enriching the legislative agenda, which also includes multiple crypto tax bills proposed by U.S. lawmakers. Expanding the ban to the president raises political risk and turns what might have been a narrow ethical measure into a direct test of how much Congress is willing to limit the executive branch's involvement in digital assets. The reactions of industry and policy observers may affect the framework design of future legislation. Currently, crypto lobby groups are organizing power for the 2026 election, while state censorship is also intensifying.
