EN ▼
Favorites
My Favorites
View All
Market Cap Price 24h%

Disclaimer: Content does not constitute investment advice. Trading involves risks—please invest with caution!

With the advancement of AI agents, quantum Bitcoin risks have changed

2026-09-11 18:16:46
Bookmark

AI agents have significantly reduced resource requirements for quantum attacks, putting millions of bitcoins at potential risk

According to a paper published on September 9, AI agents have helped researchers reduce resource scores for key quantum computing tasks related to Bitcoin by 86.1%. It should be emphasized that this result does not mean that Bitcoin has been compromised by hackers, but shows that software optimization can significantly reduce the quantum resources required to execute the secp256k1 elliptic curve algorithm.

This study only optimizes one specific part of the attack process-the secp256k1 point-add process, rather than a complete private key recovery attack. However, this development sounds a wake-up call for blockchain developers: post-quantum security solutions must be planned in advance before fault-tolerant quantum computers become practical.

Significant drop in quantum resource scores

In May this year, Eigen Labs launched the "ECDSA.Fail" competition to improve the secp256k1 point adding circuit. The competition measures the merits of a design by "multiplying the number of logical qubits used by the average number of Toffoli gates."

As of July 26, the resource score has dropped from 10.75 billion to 1.496 billion. One of the leading designs uses 1,151 logic qubits and about 1.3 million Toffoli gates. Subsequent entries further reduced the gate count to below one million, with another design even requiring only 813 qubits.

IonQ estimates that a complete secp256k1 attack requires approximately 1,457 logic qubits and 39 million Toffoli gates. Its model translates these requirements into 19,397 physical ion trap qubits and approximately 25.7 days of processing time. In addition, Google researchers have released higher-scale gate count estimates, whose models predict that a full attack will require 1,200 to 1,450 logic qubits and 70 million to 90 million Toffoli gates. Because ECDSA.Fail optimizes only one of the subroutines, it cannot be directly compared to the full attack model.

Millions of Bitcoin public keys have been exposed

Glassnode data shows that approximately 6.04 million BTC (30.2% of the total supply) are currently at risk of public keys being exposed. Among them, approximately 1.92 million BTC are in directly exposed output addresses, and another 4.12 million BTC are at risk of associated exposure due to user behavior (such as address reuse).

Another potential risk arises when the hidden public key becomes visible after the transaction is spent. In theory, if a quantum computer is powerful enough, it could deduce the private key before the transaction is confirmed.

Response Strategies and Future Outlook

BIP360 proposes a "Pay-to-Merkle-Root" output type to reduce exposure risks from Taproot keypath spending. However, the proposal does not eliminate short-term risks in memory pools, nor does it automatically protect old coins or already exposed assets.

An advisory report from Coinbase noted that approximately 1.7 million BTC are still stored in early P2PK addresses that may be related to Satoshi or lost wallets. Developers must decide how migration rules should handle these dormant assets.

In terms of overall industry planning, Ethereum aims to achieve broad quantum resistance by December 2029, while the G7 also urges the coordination of post-quantum security planning in the financial sector in future migration plans.

Disclaimer:

All content published on this website, including hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blogs, and other media accounts, originates from third-party platforms and their users. CoinMarketInsight makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the website or its content. All blockchain-related data and materials are provided for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Users and third parties are solely responsible for the content they publish. CoinMarketInsight shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this website. You should exercise caution and conduct your own independent research, review, analysis, and verification before making any decisions.

Read Full Article
More News
TOP

TOP