Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
ETH A large-scale collaborative "pool withdrawal" incident broke out on the Robinhood chain: 53 token issues involved at least US$18.43 million
According to chain analyst Wazzz, the largest collaborative "Rug Pull" operation in the history of Robinhood Chain (hereinafter referred to as the "chain") has been traced. In approximately two months, a total of 53 token issues were linked to the same set of capital withdrawal operations, extracting at least $18.43 million from retail investors. Wazzz pointed out that considering the limitations of direct tracking, the actual amount of losses could be higher.
This operation is well-structured, replicable, and deliberately designed to avoid detection. Proceeds from one project are often used to fund the next project within seconds. Of the 53 issuance projects identified, 45 are correlated through capital flows. Among them, four projects were signed with the same private key in different release batches; four other projects shared the same collection wallet, which received funds from multiple projects.
In addition, almost every project is "attacked" in the early stages of launch, and buyers are locked in in more than 70% of the supply. These sniping operations are usually performed using wallet groups containing 70 to 200 addresses, and most are deployed through the Pons V2 protocol. Because this pattern is highly consistent, Wazzz is able to tag all involved wallets in its on-chain database.
The main projects involved in the case and fund withdrawal
The following are the top three projects by withdrawal amount:
- $CRUMBS: US$3.12 million was withdrawn through the packaging operation of 92 wallets
- $LEGS：通过77个钱包的打包操作提取290万美元
- $PINK：通过125个钱包的打包操作提取144万美元
值得注意的是，$PINK、$CRUMBS和$DEED这三个代号各自对应三个独立的发行项目，但它们均与同一套操作体系相关联。
欺诈手段解析：虚假预售合约战术
该骗局中更具算计性的元素之一是使用虚假的预售合约。操盘方会在代币正式发行前大肆炒作，随后部署一个虚假的合约地址以吸引早期买家，之后再释放真正的合约地址。这种手法通过在相同受众身上重复实施两次同样的骗局，从而最大化非法提取的资金量。
大多数推广这些发行的关键意见领袖（KOL）帖子在“撤池子”发生后立即被删除。Wazz确认仅保留了$DEED发行相关的证据，并指出涉事账户在不同项目间可能存在重叠。
对投资者及生态系统的启示
资金追踪困境：大部分被提取的资金以ETH形式持有，若无交易所配合，这些资金实际上难以冻结。
监控漏洞：该操作在长达两个月的时间内涉及53次发行而未被发现，暴露出该链在链上监控方面存在严重短板。
投资者警示：对于散户投资者而言，基本的尽职调查——包括审查钱包历史、供应分布以及部署者之间的关联——本应在造成任何损失之前就警示风险。例如，“狙击”模式、全新的部署者钱包地址以及集中的供应量，都是不容忽视的危险信号。
生态系统反思：这一高达1843万美元的提取操作由单一团伙主导，同时还发现了另外两起未关联的连环作案。这引发了人们对平台级安全保障、发行筛选机制以及保护零售用户免受此类有组织剥削所需基础设施的严肃质疑。
加密市场动态
ONDO价格飙升32%：贝莱德（BlackRock）的链上动作引发新动力
