EN ▼
Favorites
My Favorites
View All
Market Cap Price 24h%

Disclaimer: Content does not constitute investment advice. Trading involves risks—please invest with caution!

CFTC与SEC在《清晰度法案》受挫后加码加密监管

2026-09-17 03:34:08
Bookmark

Clarity法案在参议院折戟,美国加密监管博弈升级

随着《清晰度法案》(Clarity Act)在参议院无疾而终,多年来一直在争夺加密资产管辖权的两个监管机构并未就此收手。商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)和证券交易委员会(SEC)均释放出对数字资产采取更强硬姿态的信号,这使得所有在美国运营且缺乏明确法律框架的加密货币公司面临更高的合规风险。

Clarity法案失败对美国加密监管意味着什么

《数字资产市场清晰度法案》(H.R. 3633)本旨在解决加密领域最具争议的问题之一:谁负责监管什么。该法案试图在CFTC对商品类的管辖权与SEC对证券类的管辖权之间划出明确界限,为加密项目提供一条清晰的合规路径。

然而,该法案未能通过。随着法案因两党反对而在参议院陷入停滞,监管格局依然如故,模糊不清。没有新的定义,没有安全港条款,困扰行业多年的“地盘之争”也未得到任何解决。

这一立法真空的影响巨大。由于缺乏明确的法律依据,两个机构均保留了对同一资产主张管辖权的权力,并且双方似乎都愿意动用这些权力。

CFTC与SEC发出更严厉监管信号

According to reports, after the bill failed, both regulators stepped up their focus on the crypto market, drawing their respective positions independently rather than waiting for congressional mediation.

The CFTC has historically believed that most major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, are commodities within its regulatory scope, while the SEC has a broader view that most tokens are unregistered securities. Both positions are valid in the absence of legislative mandatory compromise, and both agencies are backed by enforcement mechanisms.

Timing is crucial. Senator Loomis, the bill's leading advocate, has described the vote as a "life-and-death moment" for the industry. The failure of the bill left a gap in regulatory action and filled a vacuum that could not be covered by legislation.

How regulatory changes affect crypto markets and businesses

For crypto exchanges, token issuers and institutional investors, the practical consequence is continued exposure to multiple legal risks. A company registered with the CFTC is not necessarily immune from SEC action, and vice versa. This dual threat dynamic has affected the legal strategic structure of companies such as Coinbase.

The division of responsibilities between the SEC and the CFTC is exactly what the Clarity Act aims to address. In the absence of the bill, compliance teams would face an environment where rules could change based on which agency acted first.

Institutional investors are paying close attention to developments. The CFTC recently approved SGX's crypto perpetual futures products for U.S. institutions, a sign that it is actively expanding its influence in the field rather than backing down.

The next question is whether Congress will attempt another round of legislative push, or whether the two agencies will lock in any new bill by creating rules and enforcement action before it is put for a vote. What happens next may define the regulatory landscape in the next few years.

Disclaimer:

All content published on this website, including hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blogs, and other media accounts, originates from third-party platforms and their users. CoinMarketInsight makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the website or its content. All blockchain-related data and materials are provided for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Users and third parties are solely responsible for the content they publish. CoinMarketInsight shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this website. You should exercise caution and conduct your own independent research, review, analysis, and verification before making any decisions.

Read Full Article
More News
TOP

TOP