Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
FollowingPresident of BIS: It is difficult for stablecoins to operate reliably in large payments
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has questioned the reliability of stablecoins in large payment and settlement systems. Speaking at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, BIS President Pablo Hernandez de Cos pointed out that stablecoins are unlikely to meet the standards needed for extensive financial infrastructure, Reuters reported.
stablecoins and tokenized deposits: The future of differentiation
Hernandez de Coos paints a picture of a future where stablecoins and tokenized deposits coexist but perform their own functions. He proposed that tokenized deposits-digital representatives of commercial bank funds-should assume day-to-day payment functions because they are supported by regulators. In contrast, stablecoins should be limited to specialized application scenarios where their specific functions have obvious advantages.
This distinction reflects the emerging consensus among central banks that despite the potential of blockchain-based settlement, the current stablecoin model is risky. These include the adequacy of reserve assets, the possibility of runs, and the lack of a clear legal framework in many jurisdictions.
Potential impact on bank and government debt
The president of BIS also talked about the possible broader economic impact of the shift to stablecoins. He pointed out that stablecoins could increase demand for U.S. Treasury bonds, which could reduce the government's borrowing costs. However, this benefit comes with a cost: If deposits flow from banks to stablecoins, banks may face higher financing costs, which in turn may lead to higher lending rates for consumers and businesses.
This analysis highlights a key contradiction in digital asset discussions. While stablecoins may bring efficiency gains in some areas, their growth could undermine traditional banking models that rely on stable, low-cost deposits. Central banks, including the BIS, have been warning of these risks and advocating a cautious integration approach.
What this means for the future of payments
The BIS position is important because it represents the view of a key international financial institution. Its stance influences regulatory discussions and central bank policies around the world. For businesses and consumers, the outcome of this debate will determine how digital payments evolve-whether through regulated tokenized deposits, stablecoins, or hybrid systems.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anyone involved in finance, technology or policy. The choice between stablecoins and tokenized deposits is not just a technical issue; it is also about financial stability, consumer protection and the future of the currency itself.
Conclusion
As the financial world explores digital currencies increasingly, the BIS warning reminds us that innovation must be balanced with reliability. Although stablecoins may find applications in certain specific areas, it is likely that core functions of daily payments will remain within regulated banking systems and may be enhanced through tokenization technology. The debate is far from over, but the intervention of the BIS has added an authoritative voice to the dialogue.
FAQ
Q: What is a stablecoin?
Answer: A stablecoin is a digital currency designed to maintain a stable value by pegging it to reserve assets such as the US dollar. It attempts to combine the advantages of cryptocurrencies with the stability of traditional fiat currencies.
Q: Why is BIS worried about stablecoins?
Answer: BIS is concerned that stablecoins lack the reliability and regulatory oversight needed for large-scale payment systems. Issues such as reserve transparency, redemption risks and legal clarity are key concerns.
Q: How may stablecoins affect bank lending?
Answer: If customers move deposits from banks to stablecoins, banks may lose a cheap source of funding. This could lead to higher financing costs, which in turn could lead to higher lending rates for consumers and businesses.
