Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
BTC OCEAN stops supporting the BIP-110 forked chain
The unmanaged Bitcoin mining pool OCEAN has stopped supporting the BIP-110 forked chain due to a decline in mining activity on the chain. The decision removed one of the remaining operators of the forked chain and narrowed the scope of the experiment's impact on the Bitcoin network.
Why OCEAN stopped supporting the BIP-110 bifurcated chain
OCEAN said that back-end support for the BIP-110 chain has been stopped, which means that the mine will no longer allocate computing power to the bifurcated rule set in a directional manner, nor will it build blocks under its rules. BIP-110 is a proposed fork rule set that requires miners to proactively choose execution; once there is no mining pool to route workload for it, this execution path will lose its operator. The official statement said the reason for the suspension was reduced mining activity rather than policy differences. As OCEAN-related computing power declined, the Roughnecks mining team also stopped mining in the BIP-110 standard.
Key changes:
OCEAN has stopped supporting BIP-110 forked chains on its backend. Official reason: Reduced mining activity on the chain, rather than an ideological shift.
How reduced mining activity affects the feasibility of forked chains
The existence of a bifurcated chain depends entirely on the miners who put computing power into it; blocks are produced and rules are enforced only when participants continue to direct their workload towards the rule set. When participation declines, the chain's ability to advance and operational significance also weaken. Miner incentives are at the heart of this dynamic. Computing power follows the flow of expected earnings. When a bifurcated chain cannot cover the operating costs of maintaining independent back-end infrastructure due to continued participation, continuing to support it becomes difficult to maintain at the practical level. Given the current context, the withdrawal should be seen as an operational reaction to a decline in activity rather than a denial of the proposal itself.
What this means for miners and Bitcoin fork observers
The groups most directly affected are miners who rely on OCEAN to route workload to the BIP-110 chain, as well as the Roughnecks group, which previously mined under this standard. As the mining pool exited, these participants lost the convenient infrastructure they needed to maintain BIP-110 mining. The change is significant for observers tracking adoption of fork chains because it shows that momentum around the proposal, which originally relied on proactive execution by miners to remain relevant, is fading. This is similar to the previous Bitcoin anti-spam fork chain that stalled after only two blocks, when limited miner participation quickly led to the end of the effort.
Readers who are concerned about subsequent developments should pay attention to whether other operators have taken over the implementation of BIP-110, and how the reallocated computing power will return to the main chain-the difficulty adjustment mechanism of the main chain will continue to be based on the final investment of network miners. Recalibrated.
