Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
XRP Stuart Alderoty calls on senators to listen to crypto holders before voting on the Clarity Act
Ripple's Stuart Alderoty is urging U.S. senators to do one thing before voting on the Clarity Act: listen to the voices of crypto asset holders. The call puts ordinary token holders at the center of the digital asset regulation debate, rather than lobbying groups or corporate executives.
Focus on holder groups
According to relevant reports, Alderoty, on behalf of Ripple, called on senators to directly listen to the opinions of crypto holders before voting. His message clearly sees senators as an audience and sets a voting date as the deadline for action. The move is another familiar move by Ripple to intervene in the debate over cryptocurrency policy in Washington. The company has previously responded directly to U.S. Senate questions about cryptocurrency regulation and publicly criticized a Senate cryptocurrency markets bill.
Alderoty made it clear that senators should hear from crypto holders before voting. However, this call does not claim to speak on behalf of these holders. Current reports do not include any surveys, testimony or polls to show what token owners truly think of the bill. Alderoty is asking for their opinions, not reporting established conclusions. This distinction is crucial: the request is intended to expand participation in the discussion and give more people the opportunity to express their views, rather than the statement holders 'unanimous support or opposition to the legislation. The report also did not mention that formal consultations or hearings had been held.
The Clarity Act vote sets a time limit
Alderoty's timing was carefully considered: the call came on the eve of the Clarity Act vote. It was a call to act before the Senate made a decision, not to remedy it afterwards. Currently, specific details about the vote-including the date, Senate procedures and the exact legislative stage-have not been clarified in existing reports. Readers can track parliamentary activity directly through the Senate's official calendar without relying on a second-hand timeline.
Ripple's involvement on this matter is consistent with its consistent pattern of challenging the Senate's approach to cryptocurrency regulation. In addition, the regulatory context has shifted this year as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission dropped its appeal in the Ripple XRP case, making such calls is particularly critical at a time when.
So, the core outstanding issue in the Clarity Act is not just how senators vote, but whether they really give a say to those who actually own cryptocurrencies before voting.
Disclaimer : This article is for reference only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. There are significant risks in the cryptocurrency and digital asset markets. Be sure to conduct independent research before making a decision.
