Pi网络与比特币挖矿：为何两者的挖矿模式存在差异

Pi Network 与比特币挖矿：两种模型的实际运作机制

“Pi Network vs Bitcoin Mining”这一主题常引发读者的困惑，因为两者虽然共享“挖矿”一词，但其背后的理念截然不同。在比特币（BTC）体系中，“挖矿”意味着通过算力竞赛来解决复杂的计算难题；而在 Pi Network 中，“挖矿”则象征着每日签到打卡，并协助构建一个基于信任的网络。

本指南旨在澄清这一概念混淆。一方面，比特币挖矿需要专用的硬件设备；另一方面，Pi Network 的运行主要依托于手机应用程序。本文将依据 Pi 白皮书及比特币项目官方文档，对这两种模式进行解析，严格区分已确认的技术设计与项目方的宣传主张。文中所述事实均经过截至 2026 年 10 月的核查。

比特币挖矿是如何工作的？

比特币挖矿是一场竞赛，也是理解 Pi Network 与比特币差异的核心基准。矿工将待处理的交易打包成一个区块，随后寻找一个特定的数值（Nonce），使得该区块的哈希值低于预设的目标值。哈希值是数据生成的简短数字指纹。

According to official mining guidelines, dedicated chips (ASICs) try different Nonce values at extremely high speeds. Nences are just numbers that miners constantly change to generate new hashes. If a valid solution cannot be found, the software will adjust the block content and start the search again. The first miner to achieve the goal will add the block and receive rewards and transaction fees. The original Bitcoin paper described this mechanism as "one CPU, one vote", meaning that the longest chain represents the largest workload.

Pi white paper summarizes Bitcoin with three key details: the maximum supply of tokens is 21 million; a new block is generated approximately every 10 minutes; and the block reward is halved after every 210,000 blocks.

Independent and pooled mining

Two forms of Bitcoin mining are listed in the guide. Independent miners enjoy the full reward, but the waiting time between awards can be very long. Pooled miners aggregate computing power and allocate rewards based on "shares" that prove that they have contributed effective computing work.

In the example in the guide, the target difficulty of the mining pool is about 1/100 of the overall difficulty of the network, which means that on average, about 100 shares are needed for each block generated. Therefore, the pool will pay 1/100 of the total reward based on each share.

How does Pi Network mining work?

When comparing Pi Network with Bitcoin, the primary difference is whether it involves computing difficulties. Pi Network skipped this step. According to its white paper, the network is built on top of the Stellar Consensus Protocol. Under this design, nodes provide endorsements to other nodes they trust without consuming energy to win a lottery game of chance.

Pi networks are also using a broader definition of "mining". The white paper defines it as receiving newly generated Pi tokens for contributing to the network. Mobile phone users did not perform any hashing operations.

Four roles in Pi mining

The white paper lists four main roles:

• Pioneer: Daily confirms that users are real people rather than robots.
• Contributor: Designate trusted people to form a safety circle.
• Ambassador: Introducing new users to the network.
• Node: Run Pi node software on a computer to assist in running consensus algorithms.

A user can serve multiple roles. The project party stated that the combined security circle forms a global trust map for nodes to use.

Changes in Mainnet since its launch

The Mainnet chapter adds more reward factors. The calculation formula is the base rate multiplied by the bonus factors for safety circles, locked positions, nodes, recommendations and application usage. Each valid safety circle connection can increase the base rate by 20%, and up to five connections can be superimposed.

For the current comparison between Pi Network and Bitcoin mining, Mainnet will start with a closed network phase in December 2021. Balance transfers require identity verification (KYC). There is no corresponding mechanism for this kind of check in the Bitcoin protocol.

Mining design is only half the story, market behavior is equally important. The latest Pi network price forecast tracks PI's movement around key levels.

Pi Network and Bitcoin mining: comparison item by item

Factors Pi Network Bitcoin (Bitcoin) core method Federal Byzantine protocol with trust graph Proof of Work hash race hardware requirements mobile application; Nodes need computers ASIC-specific chips, reward timing, calculated according to the participation level, and calculated according to the schedule. Energy consumption per block is about 10 minutes. The project party describes it as low energy consumption and high energy consumption (designed). The maximum supply is 100 billion Pi.(Mainnet model) 21 million BTC authentication transfer balance to Mainnet requires KYC protocol level, no requirement block speed, the project claimed that about 5 seconds and about 10 minutes, the above comparison table shows two very different goals. Bitcoin ensures security through real-world costs;Pi rewards rewards through engagement and verified identity.

Simply calling Pi mining "easier" is one-sided. Its rewards rely on trusted links, token lock-in and KYC verification rather than computing power. For market views on PI's recent market conditions, the relevant PI price outlook covers a variety of scenarios until 2030.

Which model can decentralize supply more broadly?

In the comparison between Pi Network and Bitcoin, the distribution of supply is crucial. The Pi white paper points out that Bitcoin's ASIC farms and early holders resulted in the concentration of coins in the hands of a few people. This is the argument of the project, not an established fact. The way the Pi itself is allocated is also a design choice.

Under the Mainnet token model, the declared maximum supply is 100 billion Pi. The project party stated that its allocation was as follows:

• 80% of the community: of which 65 billion will be used for mining incentives, 10 billion will be used for future foundations, and 5 billion will be used for liquidity.
• 20% core team: Unlock only on a proportional basis and is linked to community mining.

White paper states that Pi has no ICO or crowdfunding sales. These are only design goals and not current circulating supplies.

There are trade-offs between major risks and unsolved mysteries

. A fair comparison of Pi Network to Bitcoin should clearly point out the following risks:

• Files may change: The Pi white paper notes that some chapters may need updates and directs readers to the latest project newsletters.
• Extensibility unproven: white paper states that consensus scalability is an open research issue as nodes increase.
• Speed data is only for claims: Block time and transaction volume per second (TPS) data are derived from the project party's own text.
• Bitcoin also has costs: Energy use and pool concentration are real controversial topics.

Readers interested in the market can refer to recent PI price analysis.

Final summary of Pi Network and Bitcoin mining

In the comparison between Pi Network and Bitcoin mining, Bitcoin is a competitive, energy-backed block battle; Pi mining is a participation model based on trusted links, verified identities, and predetermined rewards.

What is currently uncertain is the extent to which Pi's design can be scaled in practical applications. Readers should check for the latest project updates and read two white papers for comprehensive information.