Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
BTC 比特币迷雾案裁决要点
纽约管辖权争议：联邦检察官引用“比特币迷雾”案的上诉法院裁决，反对罗曼·斯托姆（Roman Storm）的无罪释放动议。
华盛顿特区巡回上诉法院维持了对“比特币迷雾”（Bitcoin Fog）运营商罗曼·斯特林诺夫（Roman Sterlingov）的定罪和量刑。检察官认为，曼哈顿地区使用Tornado Cash的行为足以在纽约确立斯托姆部分案件的管辖权。卡瑟琳·波尔·法伊拉（Katherine Polk Failla）法官已于2026年4月听取了相关动议的辩论，目前尚未作出裁决。
斯托姆表示，司法部“仍在倾尽全力追究我的责任”。
案件背景与最新进展
在推动驳回Tornado Cash开发者罗曼·斯托姆的无罪释放申请时，联邦检察官援引了近期“比特币迷雾”案的上诉法院裁决。周一提交的法律文件中，检察官将该裁决作为补充依据，以支持其反对立场。该案件正在纽约南区联邦地区法院审理。
该裁决于9月25日由美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院作出，维持了对运营加密货币混币器“比特币迷雾”的罗曼·斯特林诺夫的定罪及判决。
“比特币迷雾”裁决的核心内容
The District of Colombia Circuit Court of Appeals found that Washington, D.C., was the appropriate jurisdiction to hear the four charges against Strinoff. "Jurisdiction" refers to the place where a case can legally be tried.
For money laundering charges, the court relied on evidence that an undercover agent conducted bitcoin-fog transactions from his Washington, D.C. office.
Regarding the accusation of unlicensed money transmission, the court held that there was sufficient evidence that the Bitcoin Mist had served customers in the jurisdiction.
Prosecutors said the ruling "directly supports" their position in Storm's case. They argued that Tornado Cash activities in the Manhattan area were sufficient to establish Storm's jurisdiction in New York for alleged money laundering and conspiracy to transfer unlicensed money.
Prosecutors referred to the testimony of Shakeeb Ahmed. Ahmed said he used Tornado Cash from his Manhattan apartment.
Dispute over jurisdiction in New York
In a motion for acquittal filed in 2025, Storm argued that Ahmed's use of Tornado Cash was not sufficient to establish jurisdiction. He believes the deals did not lead to alleged collusion.
The prosecutor disagreed with this. They argue that even temporary deposits help mixers because they increase the trading pool used to hide capital flows. Prosecutors pointed out that the same reasoning applied to Ahmed's activities and believed it proved that he used the service to facilitate the alleged conspiracy.
In August 2025, a jury found Storm guilty of colluding to operate an unlicensed money transmission business. But the jury failed to reach a consensus on money laundering and sanctioning conspiracy charges.
Storm filed a post-trial motion for acquittal in September 2025, claiming that prosecutors had failed to prove that he intended to help criminals abuse Tornado Cash.
Judge Fayla heard arguments on the motion in April 2026, but has not yet issued a ruling. If the above outstanding charges remain, a retrial on the charges of deadlock is scheduled to be held on April 26, 2027.
Storm's response
Storm criticized the new legal documents in a Platform X post posted on Monday: "The Justice Department is still doing everything it can to pursue me." He wrote.
He also pointed to the Ministry of Finance's announcement on Monday that it would withdraw its proposed cryptocurrency mixer rules. Storm argued that the government has taken contradictory attitudes towards cryptographic privacy tools.
