EN ▼
Favorites
My Favorites
View All
Market Cap Price 24h%

Disclaimer: Content does not constitute investment advice. Trading involves risks—please invest with caution!

XRP ledger returns to stability after July flood attack

2026-09-09 20:22:27
Bookmark

XRPL network returns to stability: CTO Emeritus David Schwartz confirms that Hub metrics have returned to normal

David Schwartz, former chief technology officer (CTO) of Ripple and one of the original architects of XRP Ledger ($XRP), said that the XRPL Hub he manages has remained stable for two consecutive weeks. The phenomenon was seen as the clearest sign that the network has recovered from the devastating Manifest flood attack it suffered in July.

Hub indicators return to normal levels

Schwartz reported that his Hub currently has 406 active connections, which is basically consistent with the recent average of 401. The Hub typically reliably maintains approximately 400 concurrent connections, peaking at 423. During monitoring, the latency dropped to 165 milliseconds.

Intermediate node latency has also remained near recent averages, and node disconnection has decreased. The number of "disconnections due to abuse", a key indicator of residual attack activity, remains limited. The telemetry data covers the time period from August 25 to September 8, and the Hub is one of the key relay nodes of XRPL through which other network nodes communicate.

The only exception that occurred was a one-time delay surge on September 6, but the algorithm successfully contained it without affecting the consensus mechanism.

Review of July Events

On the evening of July 30, 2026, a large number of Manifest messages spread in XRP Ledger's point-to-point network, crushing the Manifest processing logic in xrpld and causing large-scale node disconnection. Many nodes lost most of their peers within minutes, including two UNL (Trusted List) nodes operated by Ripple and XRPSCAN.

The attacker injected a large number of fake or unverified verifiers Manifest into the network. These cryptographic certificates allow the verifier to announce changes to its master key or temporary signing key. However, because xrpld lacks sufficient resource constraints when handling a large number of untrusted Manifest, pressure on CPU and memory resources increases sharply as nodes try to verify, track, and store incoming data.

Despite the attack, the underlying ledger never stopped running or forked, and the remaining UNL validators remained a consensus throughout the flood attack. There were no financial losses, private keys leaked or ledger data integrity issues.

Community developers responded quickly, diagnosed the root cause, and pushed emergency mitigation measures to multiple nodes within hours. Subsequently, a separate public hot fix (xrpld version 3.2.1) was released on the evening of July 31.

The 3.2.1 update introduces four safeguards:

  • rejects excessively large validators Manifest until fully decoded;
  • limits the number of incoming Manifest batches that nodes process simultaneously;
  • limits the amount of Manifest data shared with newly connected peers;
  • Prevent nodes from storing Manifest from more than 100 unknown verifier keys.

Schwartz's latest Hub data shows that these fixes are still effective under actual operating conditions, providing the XRP community with confirmation of data support and proving that the Peer layer of the network has achieved stability.

Disclaimer:

All content published on this website, including hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blogs, and other media accounts, originates from third-party platforms and their users. CoinMarketInsight makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the website or its content. All blockchain-related data and materials are provided for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Users and third parties are solely responsible for the content they publish. CoinMarketInsight shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this website. You should exercise caution and conduct your own independent research, review, analysis, and verification before making any decisions.

Read Full Article
More News
TOP

TOP