EN ▼
Favorites
My Favorites
View All
Market Cap Price 24h%

Disclaimer: Content does not constitute investment advice. Trading involves risks—please invest with caution!

Blockstream refuses to pay ransom for stolen bitcoins from the Liquid network

2026-09-12 03:23:32
Bookmark

Key Facts

Blockstream said it would not pay ransom for bitcoins stolen from the Liquid network and rejected a request that it fill the funding gap itself. After the attackers returned 3,400 BTC on September 7, approximately 598.5 BTC (worth approximately US$47 million) remained unrecovered.

Liquid Network resumed block production and trading on September 10, but as a precautionary measure, the peg-outs feature remains disabled.

Refusal to Pay Ransom

Blockstream announced on Friday that it would not pay ransom for Bitcoin (BTC) stolen from the Liquid network, rejecting attackers 'requests to cover the remaining 15 percent of the funds. This refusal left 598.5 BTC worth approximately US$47 million remaining unrecovered five days after the front chain was cleared.

Blockstream stated in a statement: "Unauthorized acquisition of assets and withholding their return is a criminal act and not a responsible security disclosure." "This is not white hat behavior, this is theft." The company said it would not accept a precedent where open source developers face "extortion far beyond their financial participation."

Threat from attackers

The attacker once told Blockstream via an online message that it should use its own funds to pay the missing 15% as a vulnerability bounty. "You must pay 15% of your own money as a loophole bounty, or you will cause a 15% loss to all holders." They wrote in the message.

Principle of Liquid Network Vulnerability

Liquid is a Bitcoin sidechain operated by a consortium of exchanges and companies, in which BTC is locked and reissued as LBTC for faster settlement. Liquid pointed out in the incident report that on September 6, there was a flaw in the way Liquid node cache proof of range verification in the open source Elements software, resulting in approximately 4,000 LBTC being created without corresponding bitcoin endorsements.

These unendorsed tokens were converted to bitcoin through SideSwap, a member of the alliance holding an anchored withdrawal authorization key, and the alliance then released the funds as authorized. Liquid said no keys were compromised, but reserves had been reduced from approximately 4,205 BTC to 197 BTC before the network was suspended.

SideSwap said in a statement that its authorization keys are kept online and payouts (payment processes) are automatically forwarded, and that the pipeline does not apply any size or speed limits.

Transactions resumed, anchored withdrawals are still disabled

Blockstream patched Liquid's bridge node on September 7, and the attacker returned 3,400 BTC to the Alliance Wallet the same day. Emergency Elements version v23.3.4 was subsequently released, after multiple rounds of internal and external reviews. Block production resumed on September 10, and trading resumed that night.

Liquid stated that as a precautionary measure, while the final phase of the recovery continues, the anchored withdrawal feature remains turned off and node operators have been notified to upgrade.

Alex Thorn, Galaxy's company-wide research director, called the incident "another wave of offensive in our new online reality" in a post on the day the explosion occurred.

Disclaimer:

All content published on this website, including hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blogs, and other media accounts, originates from third-party platforms and their users. CoinMarketInsight makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the website or its content. All blockchain-related data and materials are provided for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Users and third parties are solely responsible for the content they publish. CoinMarketInsight shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this website. You should exercise caution and conduct your own independent research, review, analysis, and verification before making any decisions.

Read Full Article
More News
TOP

TOP