EN ▼
Favorites
My Favorites
View All
Market Cap Price 24h%

Disclaimer: Content does not constitute investment advice. Trading involves risks—please invest with caution!

美国证券交易委员会解释代币化股票如何在区块链上运作

2026-09-18 06:45:18
Bookmark

The SEC releases a framework for tokenized stocks to operate on public chains

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has outlined a framework for how tokenized stocks can operate on public blockchains, addressing core structural issues that hinder equity products on the compliance chain from entering the market: who holds legal ownership, how to record transfers, and what role a regulated intermediary must play when shares are on the chain.

According to CoinDesk, this outline is not a final rule formulation, but a signal that stock tokens may apply under existing securities market regulatory rules. For anyone building a tokenized equity infrastructure, this distinction is crucial: The SEC is charting a compliance path rather than clearing the runway. This marks a broader shift in attitude among regulators. Previously, the SEC had approved on-chain trading of tokenized stocks and opened up innovative exemptions for tokenized securities trading platforms, demonstrating the institution's willingness to interact with blockchain-based market structures rather than banning it directly.

Ownership records and the role of regulated intermediaries

In any tokenized stock model, a core issue is whether the token itself constitutes legal ownership of the underlying shares, or whether it relies on representatives of off-chain records. The SEC's outline draws the line: tokenized stocks are not the same instrument as underlying securities. Legal ownership continues to flow through existing systems of transfer agents, broker-dealers and depositaries.

这意味着链上的代币转让不会自动更新股份登记簿。无论是一家过户代理人还是一家根据适用证券法运营的托管人,都必须将链上活动转化为法律认可的所有权。这对协议设计者意义重大:代币化股票系统不能是一个纯粹的智能合约堆栈。它需要一个连接到公认记录保存基础设施的合规层。

这在结构上与代币化美国国债的构建方式相似,其中链上代币由受监管实体管理的债权代表,而非直接的工具所有权。SEC 似乎正在发出信号,表明相同的模式适用于股票。

发行、结算与链上转让控制

在发行方面,任何股票代币都需要由合规托管安排中持有的实际股份作为支持。代币供应量必须映射到可验证的基础头寸,发行人或托管人有义务维持这种对应关系。概述的模型中未提及合成或未支持的 Representation。

链上可转让性引发了一组独立的合规要求。由于股票是受监管的证券,转让必须符合适用的转售限制、合格投资者要求和反洗钱/了解你的客户(AML/KYC)规则。SEC 的大纲暗示,转让控制、链上白名单或身份验证层并非可选的附加组件,而是任何合规代币的结构要求。未经修改,无许可的 ERC-20 模型无法满足这些条件。

结算是该大纲可能对 DeFi 产生最深远影响的领域。区块链结算的时间线与目前美国股票市场使用的 T+1 结算周期不同。原子链上结算是否满足证券法的结算要求,或者是否仍需与中央清算基础设施进行对账,仍然是 SEC 公开通信中未完全解决的一个开放性问题。

股息、投票权与公司行动

代币化股票持有人在股东权利方面面临结构性缺口。股息、代理投票和公司行动资格流向证券法认可的记录持有人。由于链上代币持有人可能不是现有系统下公认的记录持有人,代币持有人可能获得经济敞口,而不会自动获得投票权或股息分配。

SEC 的大纲承认了这一差距,但未完全弥补它。在此框架上构建的任何系统都需要一种机制,将股息和投票权从托管人或中介机构传递给代币持有人。这既是一个行政和法律工程问题,也是一个智能合约问题,目前在代币化证券领域尚未以标准化的方式解决。

该大纲对 DeFi 市场结构的意义

The practical impact of the SEC outline is that compliant tokenized stocks are possible, but only in models that rely heavily on regulated intermediaries. This limits the extent to which tokenized equity can be combined with permissionless DeFi protocols to a certain extent. Tokenized stocks that require whitelisted wallets, authentication and intermediation layers cannot be placed in the standard AMM pool without applying these restrictions to all counterparties.

This constraint does not eliminate the value proposition. Faster clearing, more efficient record-keeping, fragmented ownership, and programmable corporate actions are all feasible in this outlined model. But builders who view tokenized stocks as a way to achieve unlicensed equity exposure will find that the compliance structure largely limits this vision. The SEC opens the door to tokenized U.S. stock trading with specific structural requirements.

Remaining regulatory issues include investor disclosure obligations, market monitoring of on-chain equity transactions, custody standards for underlying shares, and how cross-border token transfers interact with U.S. securities laws. These are not marginal cases; they are the architecture of any production system. The SEC's outline marks the beginning, not the end, of the regulatory dialogue. Builders and issuers should design the next round of formal guidance (whether through no-action letters, rulemaking, or exemption orders) as actual compliance thresholds.

Disclaimer:

All content published on this website, including hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blogs, and other media accounts, originates from third-party platforms and their users. CoinMarketInsight makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the website or its content. All blockchain-related data and materials are provided for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Users and third parties are solely responsible for the content they publish. CoinMarketInsight shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this website. You should exercise caution and conduct your own independent research, review, analysis, and verification before making any decisions.

Read Full Article
More News
TOP

TOP