Cardano创始人施压Gemini交易所最终上线ADA

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson disagrees with Gemini again

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson returns to familiar controversial topics after the Gemini co-founder's anniversary speech. His response reignited discussions about non-available ADA tokens, while also raising a question that Gemini has never publicly answered: Why is Cadano still not available on its platform?

Several possible explanations are currently circulating, from listing requirements to business priorities to tensions. Each statement is worth considering, but none can confirm the actual reason for the exchange to exclude ADA.

Gemini's listing policy cannot explain why Cadano

Gemini decides which digital assets to support, and its selection process considers multiple factors. Relevant reports pointed out that liquidity, demand, practicality, regulatory and other requirements are part of the exchange's listing standards. These categories help explain how exchanges value tokens: liquidity focuses on customers 'ability to trade without significant price differences; demand focuses on potential customer interest; and practicality focuses on the functionality of the asset. Regulatory requirements can also affect asset availability.

However, general policies do not explain specific decisions. Claiming that "Cardano did not meet Gemini's internal requirements" requires evidence that the exchange did evaluate the ADA and therefore refused to include it on the list. The asset list released by Gemini did not explain why Cardano was excluded, so the missing listing program left an unsolved mystery and failed to prove that the ADA failed to meet specific requirements.

Community theory on conflicts of interest has not been proven

The Reddit discussion cited in the context of

provides another possible explanation. Some users suspect that business priorities or conflicts of interest may affect Gemini's asset choices. These comments express the community's views, but do not establish the fact that Gemini deliberately excluded ADA in favor of another cryptocurrency.

This distinction is important because outsiders cannot fully observe the exchange's business decisions. Customer needs, technical resources and expected revenue can all affect which assets are supported. However, identifying a possible factor does not mean proving that it determines the final outcome. Available information supports the following conclusion:

• Community reviews describe theories about Gemini decision-making.
• These theories do not establish intentional favoritism.
• The actual cause of Gemini has not yet been publicly explained.

Presenting these doubts as established motives would make the Cardano listing dispute seem more conclusive than the evidence allows.

Hoskinson's public criticism does not explain Gemini's decision

Charles Hoskinson has previously criticized Gemini over data leaks and issues related to Genesis. The remarks added to the background the tension between Cardano's founders and the exchange. Public criticism may make relationships between companies less friendly, but it does not establish a link between Hoskinson's comments and Gemini's decision to go public with the ADA.

The order of events alone cannot prove motive. Criticism and continued exclusion may occur at the same time, but criticism is not the reason for exclusion. Unless Gemini explains its decision, this connection cannot be considered a fact. Previously, Hoskinson's comments helped clarify the tone of the controversy but did not resolve issues about ADA usability.

Gemini's Cadano educational content does not commit ADA transactions

Gemini has also published educational content about Cadano through its cryptocurrency education platform Cryptopedia. This confirms that the exchange covers the project in its educational materials. However, educational articles do not establish plans for ADA transactions or information about upcoming listings.

Education and exchange support serve different purposes. An article could explain a cryptocurrency without committing the platform to provide deposit, custody or trading services for the asset. The actual difference is simple:

• Cadano's educational content confirms the coverage on Cryptoppedia.
• ADA transactions require separate exchange decisions.
• Education coverage does not provide any confirmed marketing timeline.

Therefore, Cryptopedia's article cannot be used as evidence that Cadano will soon be available on Gemini. Only an official announcement can provide a clearer answer.

BSCN reported that Hoskinson reiterated ADA requirements to go public.

BSCN reported that Hoskinson responded to an anniversary message shared by Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss, leaving a message saying "List ADA." His brief response re-publicly called on Gemini to support Cadano.

Hoskinson has reportedly previously argued that Gemini lost significant revenue by excluding ADA transactions. This is his business argument, and the information provided does not independently establish how much revenue the exchange could have earned. His reasoning is that ADA transactions can bring activity volume and fees to Gemini. However, potential revenue depends on customer demand, transaction volume, rate levels and the cost of supporting the asset.

The latest request also did not confirm that Gemini intended to take action. The public appeal from Cadano's founders is different from the exchange's announcement.

FAQs

How much will a Cadano be worth in 2030?

Crypto analysts 'price forecasts for 2030 Caddano (ADA) vary widely, with conservative forecasts as low as US$0.14 and bullish forecasts as high as US$5.00 or more.

Should I buy Cadano or XRP?

The choice between Cadano and XRP depends on your risk tolerance and whether you want to choose a token that focuses on global payments or a token built for smart contracts.