Exchange Ranking
Top Exchanges
24h Volume Ranking
Popularity Ranking
Exchange BTC Balance
Proof of Reserves
Decentralized Exchanges
Funding Rate
Funding Heatmap
Liquidation Data
Max Pain
Long/Short Ratio
Whale L/S Ratio
Binance/Okex/Huobi L/S
Bitfinex Margin L/S
ETF Tracker
Solana ETF
XRP ETF
Hong Kong ETF
Bitcoin Treasuries
Crypto Reversal
Ethereum Reserves
HyperLiquid Wallet Analysis
Hyperliquid Whale Watch
Large Transactions
On-chain Movement
Bitcoin ROI
Stablecoin Market Cap
Options Analysis
News
Articles
Economic Calendar
Features
Wallet
Contract Calculator
Security
Collections
Watchlist
Following
BTC The White House agrees to new ethics provisions in the CLARITY Act
According to media reports, the White House has agreed to add new ethics provisions to the highly watched cryptocurrency market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. However, the specific scope of the agreement and the actual content of the revised wording still need to be further verified.
The core of this progress lies in the ethics provisions attached to the CLARITY Act. The bill is a House-led effort to set rules for the digital asset market. Relevant reports pointed out that this action only represented a consensus on specific ethics provisions, rather than a comprehensive endorsement of the entire bill. What needs to be clear is that agreeing to a certain moral wording does not mean that the White House supports the entire CLARITY Act, nor does it mean that the bill is formally passed. At present, there is no conclusive evidence to confirm key information such as the ownership party, time details and specific participants behind the agreement.
There has been a long-standing debate over moral rules in the bill. Previous reports said that the ethics provisions of the CLARITY Act involve Trump 's role as state attorney general, indicating that conflicts of interest issues surrounding the legislation have been a focus of negotiations.
Possible changes brought by the new ethics clause
It must be frankly pointed out that as of now, the specific terms and conditions have not been publicly disclosed. As a result, until the text of the amendment is confirmed and checked against the body of the bill, it is impossible to responsibly describe the obligations it creates, its coverage and how it is implemented. In addition, in the absence of earlier language versions for comparison, any claim that the new wording tightens, relaxes, or reshapes previous moral rules has no basis because the prerequisites for juxtaposing the two have not yet been met.
What is certain is that ethics issues have been a pressure point on the bill for months, accompanied by intensive lobbying. As the battle over the final shape of legislation intensifies, cryptocurrency companies and banks have targeted senators in their states.
The future direction of the CLARITY Act
It is unclear whether the agreed language has been formally incorporated into the bill. The official record of the measure (House Bill 3633) is available on the Congress website (Congress.gov), which is the primary channel for verifying any integrated text or procedural steps.
From the Senate perspective, the bill is gaining momentum. Reports have pointed out that the Senate vote on the CLARITY Act is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also expressed confidence in the bill's passage before the vote.
However, any timetable linked to specific ethics clauses has not yet been confirmed. In addition, the question of whether the agreement really cleared the obstacles or just reset the negotiation process is also open. If the White House did approve the wording, would this provide the necessary political cover to move the bill to a vote, or would it simply shift the controversy to the next contested clause?
Disclaimer : This article is for reference only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. There are significant risks in the cryptocurrency and digital asset markets. Be sure to conduct independent research before making a decision.
